Do you have a PLE candidate? Decide on the next school now


Every January and February of each year, I witness parents running around like headless chicken trying to get their children into secondary schools. This is the time when head teachers, staff and members of school management boards make a killing being bribed for places in the schools. It is common to find a parent parting with UGX 4 Million (USD 1,100) just to get a place for their son/daughter only to pay official school fees of slightly under that amount.

As a parent, I thought I would share some advice on how to go about this process. By the time your child has hit 12 years and is a candidate for PLE, I expect any serious parent to have studied them well enough by now to know who they are, what they like or dislike and what kind of gifts they have. It doesn’t matter whether your child has been in a boarding primary school, the onus is upon us parents to bond with these children.

When you know your child well or fairly enough, then comes the next stage of identifying which academic institution would holistically bring up your child not only academically well but also boost her/his God given skills. If a child is talented in swimming, you have no business insisting on them going to a secondary school that does not offer swimming facilities simply because they shall be spending most of their time at school i.e. 8 months of the year. How do you expect them to excel in their gift when they only utilise the short holiday to practise? This analogy applies to other sports disciplines as well as extra curricula activities like drama, farming, entrepreneurship among others.

I know most parents are tuned to largely two things;

  1. A school that will make the child score distinctions so that they can be the best academically in the country (This is why some schools have chosen the shorter path of cheating for the students in order to achieve this goal)

  2. A school that can be regarded as having the Who is Who !! They want to see their children hobnobbing with ministers’ children or partaking of a family legacy (my grand father, father and now me all went to school X)

If your inclination is in line with what I just stated above, it’s also ok. Feel free to pursue that line. However, I do believe that the best option would to carefully scan the options around before setting on a secondary school.

Set up a check list to be followed so that you do not bias yourself while undertaking the study. The checklist may include some or all of the following questions;

  • What talents does your child possess?

  • What kind of learning environment does the school provide?

  • How much contact time is the child likely to have with the teachers? (There are schools where a stream has 100 students, that definitely offers little or no contact time for most students)

  • What pillars is the school built upon? (Is it religious ie Moslem, Christian etc or Sports or Drama all the way to ethical considerations)

  • What do current students say about the school?

  • What is the school fees structure?

  • What level of extra curricular activities is provided?

  • How can the school shape your child into the person you want the to be in future? (Starts with knowing your child)

  • You can add onto this list ….

Using this checklist, take a tour of different schools (invest time in this process, do not rely on recommendations from buddies in pubs). Assess them by talking to the different parties concerned.

When you follow such a methodical approach especially with a good headstart, you’re less likely to gravitate like a headless chicken when the time comes. Infact, you shall discover that the mindset you had prior to this exercise has been debunked.

Start now to plan for your child’s next school. You will be glad that you did so.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant

Twitter: @wirejames

Email: lunghabo (at) gmail (dot) com

From Subsistence to Commercial Farming. Smallholder farmers at crossroads


Muniru, a rice farmer from Leresi in Butaleja district has been growing rice for over fifteen years. He however doesn’t know why he’s still a poor man. His story was no different from that of other farmers I met during a Rice Value Addition training organised by The Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows supported by the Skills Development Facility (SDF), a project under the Private Sector Foundation of Uganda (PSFU).

As urban elites, we tend to have a lot of theories on how to transform our largely peasant dominated small holder farming population into a more prosperous one. Unfortunately, until we get to understand the psychology of these farmers, we shall keep shooting off target with our noble but poorly thought out solutions.

sorghum

Sorghum crop

Over the past twenty years, the ever growing urbanisation and industrialisation has led to a vast increase in the demand for all types of crops including those that were never considered cash crops three decades ago. Produce like cassava, simsim, soya beans, millet, groundnuts and rice are now leading cash crops for most farmers.

Among the over one hundred farmers I had a chance to train in this PSFU initiative, all of them confessed to selling off at least 85% of their produce. This got me to realise that these farmers are actively delving into commercial farming.

 

If they are earning money, why then do they still lament about poverty?

My overall conclusion was that, these small holder farmers are approaching commercial farming with a subsistence mindset.

Their subsistence mindset is betrayed by the fact that;

  • They freely grow any crop for as long as there is someone to buy it.

  • Growing crops usually takes on the traditional approach that has been tried and tested over the centuries.

  • They spend as little money as possible on growing the crop while expecting to get as much as possible from the produce sale.

  • They sell most of their produce and use the money earned to meet various needs in and outside the home. Little or nothing is put aside for the production process.

  • Little effort is made to store food since it might get spoilt or better still the possibility to earn money from a quick sale outweighs the storage option.

  • There is minimal use of technology.

  • The land farmed is little. Hardly over three acres.

  • There are a lot of post harvest losses due to poor produce handling.

  • They operate as individual farmers right from production to produce marketing.

  • They have little or no understanding of the eventual consumer of their produce.

While I do applaud their move towards commercial farming, I have a lot of discomfort about the way they have chosen to approach it. Many of the mistakes currently being made are borne out of ignorance about commercial farming as well as third party forces like manipulation by the middlemen, poor mobilisation by the local leaders among others.

Any commercial engagement is usually premised on some of the following tenets;

  • A good understanding of the consumer’s expectations

  • A quality offering (service or product)

  • Use of appropriate inputs

  • Supply guarantees

  • Market access

  • Value addition

It’s the lack of knowledge about the foundational requirements of commercial farming that seems to be one of the biggest letdown for these smallholder farmers.

active_participation

Eager Learners

These farmers are not fools nor are they resistant to change, they simply do not know better. They exhibit a high affinity for acquiring new knowledge, and this should be closely followed up with implementation support.

 

 

old_learner

The elderly study too

Old and young, these farmers will surprise you by their openness to new ways of doing things. I found farmers who were simply comfortable with the way they grew and sold their rice under the belief that there was no better way.

Following a well structured training that traversed the entire process from seed selection through the transplanting process, to weeding, harvesting and eventually produce sale, they were able to identify numerous ways of improving their product offering.

 

elderly

Packaged rice by the farmers

Farmers that had always been content with selling stone filled broken rice to traders at the mills are now empowered both skills wise and psychologically to add value to their produce upto the level of branding and packaging ready for the eventual consumer. 

Using this experience, I now realise that efforts aimed at improving farmer livelihoods especially under the various wealth creation programs that we are bombarded with need a shake up.

An approach that does not focus on merely availing free inputs to farmers but goes ahead to integrate tailored trainings and mindset change is likely to deliver much better results.

Right now, my challenge has graduated from making these farmers appreciate value addition of their rice produce to seeking out urban markets for their high quality graded rice.

Thanks to the World Bank funded PSFU project, I have had a chance to contribute to the betterment of farmer livelihoods through this Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows initiative.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant

Blog: wirejames.com

Twitter: @wirejames

Email: lunghabo (at) gmail (dot) com