Tag Archives: small farmer

From Subsistence to Commercial Farming. Smallholder farmers at crossroads


Muniru, a rice farmer from Leresi in Butaleja district has been growing rice for over fifteen years. He however doesn’t know why he’s still a poor man. His story was no different from that of other farmers I met during a Rice Value Addition training organised by The Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows supported by the Skills Development Facility (SDF), a project under the Private Sector Foundation of Uganda (PSFU).

As urban elites, we tend to have a lot of theories on how to transform our largely peasant dominated small holder farming population into a more prosperous one. Unfortunately, until we get to understand the psychology of these farmers, we shall keep shooting off target with our noble but poorly thought out solutions.

sorghum

Sorghum crop

Over the past twenty years, the ever growing urbanisation and industrialisation has led to a vast increase in the demand for all types of crops including those that were never considered cash crops three decades ago. Produce like cassava, simsim, soya beans, millet, groundnuts and rice are now leading cash crops for most farmers.

Among the over one hundred farmers I had a chance to train in this PSFU initiative, all of them confessed to selling off at least 85% of their produce. This got me to realise that these farmers are actively delving into commercial farming.

 

If they are earning money, why then do they still lament about poverty?

My overall conclusion was that, these small holder farmers are approaching commercial farming with a subsistence mindset.

Their subsistence mindset is betrayed by the fact that;

  • They freely grow any crop for as long as there is someone to buy it.

  • Growing crops usually takes on the traditional approach that has been tried and tested over the centuries.

  • They spend as little money as possible on growing the crop while expecting to get as much as possible from the produce sale.

  • They sell most of their produce and use the money earned to meet various needs in and outside the home. Little or nothing is put aside for the production process.

  • Little effort is made to store food since it might get spoilt or better still the possibility to earn money from a quick sale outweighs the storage option.

  • There is minimal use of technology.

  • The land farmed is little. Hardly over three acres.

  • There are a lot of post harvest losses due to poor produce handling.

  • They operate as individual farmers right from production to produce marketing.

  • They have little or no understanding of the eventual consumer of their produce.

While I do applaud their move towards commercial farming, I have a lot of discomfort about the way they have chosen to approach it. Many of the mistakes currently being made are borne out of ignorance about commercial farming as well as third party forces like manipulation by the middlemen, poor mobilisation by the local leaders among others.

Any commercial engagement is usually premised on some of the following tenets;

  • A good understanding of the consumer’s expectations

  • A quality offering (service or product)

  • Use of appropriate inputs

  • Supply guarantees

  • Market access

  • Value addition

It’s the lack of knowledge about the foundational requirements of commercial farming that seems to be one of the biggest letdown for these smallholder farmers.

active_participation

Eager Learners

These farmers are not fools nor are they resistant to change, they simply do not know better. They exhibit a high affinity for acquiring new knowledge, and this should be closely followed up with implementation support.

 

 

old_learner

The elderly study too

Old and young, these farmers will surprise you by their openness to new ways of doing things. I found farmers who were simply comfortable with the way they grew and sold their rice under the belief that there was no better way.

Following a well structured training that traversed the entire process from seed selection through the transplanting process, to weeding, harvesting and eventually produce sale, they were able to identify numerous ways of improving their product offering.

 

elderly

Packaged rice by the farmers

Farmers that had always been content with selling stone filled broken rice to traders at the mills are now empowered both skills wise and psychologically to add value to their produce upto the level of branding and packaging ready for the eventual consumer. 

Using this experience, I now realise that efforts aimed at improving farmer livelihoods especially under the various wealth creation programs that we are bombarded with need a shake up.

An approach that does not focus on merely availing free inputs to farmers but goes ahead to integrate tailored trainings and mindset change is likely to deliver much better results.

Right now, my challenge has graduated from making these farmers appreciate value addition of their rice produce to seeking out urban markets for their high quality graded rice.

Thanks to the World Bank funded PSFU project, I have had a chance to contribute to the betterment of farmer livelihoods through this Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows initiative.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant

Blog: wirejames.com

Twitter: @wirejames

Email: lunghabo (at) gmail (dot) com

Irrigation!! What President Museveni’s Government needs to do


If there is one thing that I admire about President Museveni, it’s the simplicity with which he occasionally approaches issues. Months back, he appeared in the media advocating for irrigation using bicycles, jerrycans, plastic mineral water bottles and other non complex methods. His assurance was that as a nation, we needed to embrace irrigation if we are to combat the rampant crop failure year in year out as a result of over reliance on rain fed agriculture.

Drip Irrigation

President Museveni demonstrating drip irrigation at the Kityerela Presidential Demo Farm, Mayuge.

The stand he took however created a backlash on social media with the elite filled platforms criticising his efforts as falling short while baptising them by coining a new term called jerrygation. I am a small scale (largely subsistence) farmer who has never achieved even 50% of the recommended production potential each time I have grown beans, maize and groundnuts. I clearly know that the rain patterns have affected me big time. This experience led me into seriously concluding that irrigation is a pre-requisite to the future of farming in Uganda. In the Doho Rice scheme where I have well irrigated fields, I never make a loss and my production is always spot on.

In defense of President Museveni’s jerrygation, what Uganda’s farmer needs today is a consistent supply of water to be used to grow their crops. While the problem and solution have been well identified, a big gap remains when it comes to turning the solution (in this case, irrigation) into a reality.

Mr President, your demonstration farms are staffed with people who are paid a salary and have it as their job to be around day in, day out to pour water into bottles with the aim of ensuring that drip irrigation is a success. The rural farmer has no where near the resources your demonstration farms boast of. However, this does not mean that they cannot try to emulate you.

Simply put, irrigation is the application of water to plants. It requires two key things; one is, access to a water source and the other is water distribution to the garden.

While Uganda is a small country, it has different geological characteristics as you traverse it. This has an implication on what one can grow and how irrigation can best be undertaken. Parts of the country are hilly, like the West as you near the DRC border, East at the border with Kenya, while others are flat like the near East (Busoga / Bukedi), North East (Teso and Karamoja Sub Regions) as well as the North.

The crops grown across the country vary too. From the largely cereal crop base in Northern Uganda to vegetables in the South and South Western part of the country, Sugarcanes in the East and tea in the West.

All these variations have an implication on the kind of irrigation that can be undertaken, hence the approach of one size fits all not being feasible.

In order to achieve the wider goal of irrigation fed agriculture in this country, the government is going to have to among others do the following;

Zone the Country

The country has to be zoned in a manner that brings together locations with similar irrigation requirements to make it easy for eventual service provision. This zoning is also likely to help the professionals focus on addressing farmers’ water challenges with a better appreciation of the local status-quo.

Deployment of appropriate technology

Due to the variations mentioned earlier, the different areas of the country shall need varying technologies in order to have successful irrigation installations. Some of the details to be looked into while planning this are;

  • Water: Is the source of this water, surface or ground? What is its quantity, availability, flow rate and quality? An example is water that is highly saline cannot work well with sprinkler irrigation.

  • Soil: Soil texture determines its water retention capacity, permeability and transmissivity. This is very important as it determines intervals between irrigation. Permeability in particular plays an important role in surface design and sprinklers.

  • Crops: Different crops demand different watering approaches. A good number of vegetables dislike overhead water application as it tends to make them more susceptible to disease attack when their leaves are continuously wet hence the preference for a drip approach concentrated near the roots. Sugarcanes can do well with overhead as well as surface irrigation.

  • Location: Structures used in establishing the irrigation system should be able to withstand the various environmental hazards like wind, temperature, rains among others.

These and many others need to be well synthesised.

Pilot the deployment

In each set zone, there shall be a need to initially set up pilot installations in order to learn from the anticipated successes and failures. This shall have the net effect of reducing on the White Elephant approach of most government projects that display gross optimism at the start only to end up in a miserable state shortly after.

Set up a National Irrigation Authority

The current approach of letting farmers individually come up with irrigation solutions for their farms is only feasible for the big players. That small farmer with one or three acres of land might not have the resource base to undertake the infrastructural requirements.

Just like we have the National Water and Sewerage Corporation which is responsible for supplying water to homes, we need to set up a National Irrigation Authority which will be tasked with investing in the infrastructure required to ensure that different farming zones have irrigation water systems in place ready to be tapped by farmers at the last mile. This is akin to the current state of affairs where anyone setting up a house can just tap from pre-existing National Water infrastructure to get water.

This authority can then through the employment of professionals address the gaps in the current haphazard crusade aimed at promoting irrigation.

Why do I think this authority can work? Taking a look at the Doho Rice Scheme where I am a rice farmer, the Government invested in the irrigation infrastructure and all we do as farmers is to tap water as and when needed from the channels. During the low water seasons, the management team in charge rations the water flow and this helps avoid conflict among the farmers. Such a model if extrapolated to the national level could go a long way in realising the much needed progress in Agricultural production.

Some of the roles of this authority could be;

  • Carrying out feasibility studies for new irrigation projects

  • Planning, Designing, Constructing and implementation of irrigation infrastructure in the country

  • Operation and maintenance of the irrigation projects in place

  • Training farmers on different methods of irrigation

This authority can then be mandated to report directly to the office of the President since he is the champion for this cause.

It is my view that if only 30% of the total acreage of arable land in Uganda today was to be made productive year round through irrigation, we would create market leadership in food production on the African continent.

While jerrygation is a good shot at this irrigation behemoth, a more structured approach is likely to yield longer term results.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant based in Kampala, Uganda

Follow @wirejames on Twitter.

Email lunghabo [at] gmail [dot] com

Other Articles of Interest:

Photo Credit: Operation Wealth Creation