Tag Archives: small holder

When Populism antagonises Agricultural Modernisation


Over the past few weeks, I have been hard pressed to keep silent over the issue of the presidential pledge to supply hoes to farmers. By hoes, I do not mean tractor hoes but hand hoes.

The Ugandan farmer has always tilled the land for decades and bought hoes when they needed them. The beauty about these hoes is that they are very long lasting. As a child, I recall the hoes we had in the village that only occasionally required us to replace their wooden handles (omuŋini).

I agree that for our largely subsistence agriculture, the hand hoe is still very vital to the smallholder farmers. However, if one has to modernise Agriculture there is a need to look elsewhere.

The Nile Post reports the  President as having stated that, “Museveni while campaigning for his fifth term in office in 2015 directed the Prime Minister to procure 18 million hoes in the 2016/17 budget, arguing that the hoes would boost food security and incomes for small landowners which would spur Uganda to an industrial economy in 2040.

Realistically speaking, was that a well thought out assertion by the President? Did he appreciate the level of productivity through the reliance on hand hoes Vs other mechanised options? Every time you read news about agriculture, the very government talks of turning from subsistence to commercial farming. Why then this contradiction?

A look at the mechanisation of Agriculture programme reveals some flaws. The insistence by the government to distribute large tractors nationwide when the majority of our farmers operate on less than 5 acres of land requires reflection. Even when the tractor services are shared, the unit cost of tilling 2 acres here, 4 acres there and 5 acres elsewhere is much higher than when you till 50 acres all in one place. There is a need to integrate this approach with the provision of simple hand held technology like the Walking tractors.

Walking tractors are small enough to be manned by a single individual while walking or even seated (depending on the design) and can comfortably till an acre without too much hustle. They are modular in nature and can be used to slash, irrigate and other activities depending on the accessories one has. With cheap and readily available spare parts, costs of maintenance are low. By availing such tractors to village communities, the smallholder farmers are likely to be the biggest beneficiaries. This would be one of the first steps in modernising farming. The UGX 80 Billion available to purchase hoes could even be diverted to constructing an assembly plant for these Walking tractors hence guaranteeing their availability locally and at a much cheaper price.

Similar concerns have also arisen with the Wealth Creation initiative. Again, for ages farmers have been purchasing their own seed or even utilising that left over from the previous season (I do that a lot). This was never an issue until someone thought it wise to start offering them free seeds and seedlings thinking that only then can they transition to commercial farming. Apart from making farmers lazier and setting up opportunities to supply fake seedlings like the rootless orange seedlings I once came across being delivered in Iganga District, not much is expected to come out of these superfluous moves.

The fact that farmers tell you at a rally that they need hoes to dig doesn’t mean that supplying them will actually solve the problems they are facing. This is the reason the experts exist to study the underlying causes of the symptoms and recommend accordingly. If they aren’t given a chance to do their job, then the president shall be looked at as the all knowing super hero whose word is law.

James Wire

Technology and Business Consultant

@wirejames on Twitter

From Subsistence to Commercial Farming. Smallholder farmers at crossroads


Muniru, a rice farmer from Leresi in Butaleja district has been growing rice for over fifteen years. He however doesn’t know why he’s still a poor man. His story was no different from that of other farmers I met during a Rice Value Addition training organised by The Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows supported by the Skills Development Facility (SDF), a project under the Private Sector Foundation of Uganda (PSFU).

As urban elites, we tend to have a lot of theories on how to transform our largely peasant dominated small holder farming population into a more prosperous one. Unfortunately, until we get to understand the psychology of these farmers, we shall keep shooting off target with our noble but poorly thought out solutions.

sorghum

Sorghum crop

Over the past twenty years, the ever growing urbanisation and industrialisation has led to a vast increase in the demand for all types of crops including those that were never considered cash crops three decades ago. Produce like cassava, simsim, soya beans, millet, groundnuts and rice are now leading cash crops for most farmers.

Among the over one hundred farmers I had a chance to train in this PSFU initiative, all of them confessed to selling off at least 85% of their produce. This got me to realise that these farmers are actively delving into commercial farming.

 

If they are earning money, why then do they still lament about poverty?

My overall conclusion was that, these small holder farmers are approaching commercial farming with a subsistence mindset.

Their subsistence mindset is betrayed by the fact that;

  • They freely grow any crop for as long as there is someone to buy it.

  • Growing crops usually takes on the traditional approach that has been tried and tested over the centuries.

  • They spend as little money as possible on growing the crop while expecting to get as much as possible from the produce sale.

  • They sell most of their produce and use the money earned to meet various needs in and outside the home. Little or nothing is put aside for the production process.

  • Little effort is made to store food since it might get spoilt or better still the possibility to earn money from a quick sale outweighs the storage option.

  • There is minimal use of technology.

  • The land farmed is little. Hardly over three acres.

  • There are a lot of post harvest losses due to poor produce handling.

  • They operate as individual farmers right from production to produce marketing.

  • They have little or no understanding of the eventual consumer of their produce.

While I do applaud their move towards commercial farming, I have a lot of discomfort about the way they have chosen to approach it. Many of the mistakes currently being made are borne out of ignorance about commercial farming as well as third party forces like manipulation by the middlemen, poor mobilisation by the local leaders among others.

Any commercial engagement is usually premised on some of the following tenets;

  • A good understanding of the consumer’s expectations

  • A quality offering (service or product)

  • Use of appropriate inputs

  • Supply guarantees

  • Market access

  • Value addition

It’s the lack of knowledge about the foundational requirements of commercial farming that seems to be one of the biggest letdown for these smallholder farmers.

active_participation

Eager Learners

These farmers are not fools nor are they resistant to change, they simply do not know better. They exhibit a high affinity for acquiring new knowledge, and this should be closely followed up with implementation support.

 

 

old_learner

The elderly study too

Old and young, these farmers will surprise you by their openness to new ways of doing things. I found farmers who were simply comfortable with the way they grew and sold their rice under the belief that there was no better way.

Following a well structured training that traversed the entire process from seed selection through the transplanting process, to weeding, harvesting and eventually produce sale, they were able to identify numerous ways of improving their product offering.

 

elderly

Packaged rice by the farmers

Farmers that had always been content with selling stone filled broken rice to traders at the mills are now empowered both skills wise and psychologically to add value to their produce upto the level of branding and packaging ready for the eventual consumer. 

Using this experience, I now realise that efforts aimed at improving farmer livelihoods especially under the various wealth creation programs that we are bombarded with need a shake up.

An approach that does not focus on merely availing free inputs to farmers but goes ahead to integrate tailored trainings and mindset change is likely to deliver much better results.

Right now, my challenge has graduated from making these farmers appreciate value addition of their rice produce to seeking out urban markets for their high quality graded rice.

Thanks to the World Bank funded PSFU project, I have had a chance to contribute to the betterment of farmer livelihoods through this Pearl Foundation for Children and Widows initiative.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant

Blog: wirejames.com

Twitter: @wirejames

Email: lunghabo (at) gmail (dot) com