Tag Archives: James Wire

Beauty Contest Entrepreneurship


As we live to our billing as the most entrepreneurial country in the world, a disturbing trend is cropping up in Uganda that in my view should be addressed hastily. The advent of numerous entrepreneurial support initiatives over the past decade was a very welcome move considering that they are playing a big role in changing mindsets of the youths from merely being job seekers to job creators through provision of solutions to the marketplace.

Numerous youth hubs have cropped up largely supporting technology entrepreneurs with a few extending to the agricultural and other sectors. In terms of impact, there isn’t much to be proud of yet, but one cannot undermine the positive impact they have had so far.

These hubs are modeled around similar setups in other countries like the USA, Nigeria, South Africa, Kenya among others. They offer relatively cool workspaces that today’s youth would feel comfortable in and try to appeal mainly to the urban elite.

Hackathons

A few years back, we got into the trend of competitions which were dubbed Hackathons. These competitions have their benefits considering that they enable teams come up with ideas in a limited span of time with the potential of growing them into bigger business implementations. These events culminated in the announcement of “winners” who usually walked away with a cash prize. Some of the problems this approach created were;

  • Target entrepreneurs whose aim was always to come up with implementations that were only good enough to win them the hackathon cash prizes. They could then live on the income attained for the next few months as they plotted for another hackathon. Two or three wins in a year would guarantee them more income than their salaried peers with 8am to 5pm jobs.

  • Misguided entrepreneurs. A number of youths that participated and never got into the prize bracket always felt that their innovations were not worth it. This in my view was the worst perception that they ended up leaving with. There are many reasons why an innovation would have failed to enter the prize bracket top among them being the quality of judges on the panel.

These hackathons were also occasionally flawed in their execution with a high tendency of the organisers to model them along exotic yardsticks. You would always hear statements like, “this is how they do it in Nairobi.” One of the most obvious shortcomings was usually in the panels of judges as well as mentor selection. A good number of them used to be career corporate employees with high flying achievements whose experience in the entrepreneurship hustle outside their air conditioned offices in Kampala’s sky scrapers was nothing to talk about.

Many young lads had their egos crushed merely because the so called experts had failed to see the business opportunity in their ideas. I once had to counsel a young man who thought that he’d reached the apex of failure due to his inability to get the panel to see the kind of business opportunity he had set his sights upon. It’s at this point that I reminded him that the most promising entrepreneurial opportunities are never visible to just about anyone. If people could easily see what he was seeing, then they would have already rushed into that business opportunity too.

Venture Capital

From hackathons to Venture capitalists, Angel Investors and the like. The fad lately is seeking funders for business ideas. Borrowed from the west, where moneyed people with idle trust funds are looking for opportunities to grow them, the craze lately is for innovators to seek for funders. Matters have been exaggerated by reality shows like Shark Tank which encourage innovators to turn into beauty contestants.

This is how I have seen it pan out; An individual or team come up with an idea, they then embark upon making a working prototype. Once this has been achieved, they then begin focusing more on conforming to a checklist of deliverables that will make their innovation attractive to venture capitalists.

Now I’m not saying it is a bad idea to target funders, my problem is with the pre-occupation by the entrepreneurs to focus on how to be the most beautiful idea or investment around with the sole aim of attracting funders as opposed to pursuing market viability. I keep hearing of pitches for venture capital again modeled around the Silicon Valley matrix which are not really ideal for our local or even regional markets.

A number of innovators have evaded pursuing ideas that have a higher chance of offering value to their local communities simply because they are not attractive to venture capitalists and instead opted for over hyped but locally irrelevant solutions. It makes one wonder whether it’s possible for one to develop a killer solution for a foreign market without having had the experience of doing something tangible for a local or regional market. Such stories in my view are very few and rare.

This trend is what is slowly turning our young entrepreneurs into Beauty Contest Entrepreneurs. In this approach that is being preached widely, all that matters is one’s affinity to attract funders. I’m afraid to say that based on the stories I have read about people with regrets after having worked so hard to attract venture capitalists in their nascent business ideas, we are treading a wrong path. Focus shouldn’t be on the beauty of the enterprise but rather on actual delivery on the market.

Andy Birol, a reknowned business writer once said that, “Turning to venture capital for money to grow your business is sort of like going to a bar looking for someone to marry. The longer the night goes on, the clearer it is that most people you meet have short term objectives. To find capital, just as you would find a spouse, follow the same advice. Focus on your own success and the right people will buy into you for what you are, not who you might become.”

It’s not too late though to reverse this trend since most of it is going on in the few elite patronised hubs centered largely around Kampala. We need to rethink the models of entrepreneurship that would work best in our environment as opposed to lifting in a copy-paste manner whatever has been done elsewhere and expecting to superimpose it on our relatively unique business environment.

Some of the things to consider going forward include;

  • Emphasising practicability of innovations or business pursuits. Rather than be satisfied with a few media articles and TV interviews which offer that one minute of fame, the entrepreneurs need to be ready to dig the trenches and ensure that the consumer votes with his/her pocket for their service or product.

  • Originality. Those into mentoring or even training these entrepreneurs need to move beyond using text book knowledge and come up with processes and ideas that suit our business environment. These could be entirely original approaches or modified. Why would you for example let an innovator pursue an innovation whose success is overly dependent on adoption by the Government of Uganda? Anyone who has reached adolescence knows too well the twists and turns (for lack of a better term) involved in doing business with our Government.

  • Think globally but act locally. Now I do know that most of the innovators have these grand plans of being the next Bill Gates, however, it starts by acting locally before one can win over the world. Mark Zuckerberg started off by designing a meeting solution for fellow university students before the idea rolled out globally. The rest is history. You cannot expect a Ugandan innovator to become a Mark Zuckerberg overnight. They need to act locally amidst their global thinking.

Its in this regard that I really want to shout out to the following guys whose innovations I find very practical to the local market with a possibility of going regional or even global;

Safe Boda – A boda boda service that has redefined the way we publicly use motor bikes in Kampala. Complete with a Phone App, one’s experience using their service only keeps getting richer.

Yoza – A dry cleaning service that utilises freelance local labour. Those of us who are allergic to the hefty bills of the proffessional dry cleaning services as we know them, Yoza gives us an opportunity to achieve the same goal at a much lower price point. Through their Phone App, one can reach out to numerous individual service providers and get the right bargain.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology consultant based in Kampala, Uganda.

Follow @wirejames on Twitter

Email lunghabo [at] gmail.com

Mwenda wrong on Crane Bank, Facts speak for themselves – Part 2


Conscience is the voice of the soul,” says a Polish Proverb. In the first part of this two stage article, we purposely went on a historical journey to understand how banks have closed in Uganda, the circumstances, and eventual implications. We also did delve into the Project Nyonyi forensic report produced by Price Waterhouse Coopers which according to an international forensics expert I interacted with was a good job done.

The BoU Take Over

Armed with the forensic report, the central bank was right to kick into action. Mwenda argues that CBL still stood a chance but when you realise that the bank was being run like a dingy lodge in Kikoni, you then cannot blame BoU for the measures it took.

With the case of Greenland bank in 1999, BoU attempted to give the owners an opportunity to salvage the operation and nothing good came of it. The level of falsification of information from the bank was quite disturbing and this perhaps was the last nail in the coffin of that bank. As good students of history, I believe Mutebile and his team must have realised the correlation between Greenland Bank and Crane Bank in terms of falsification of information as well as lack of conformity to proper corporate governance of a Financial institution, hence the decision to take over.

Mwenda’s Assertions

Bank of Uganda acted in the most rush way in its resolution of Crane Bank issues which makes it suspicious. First when it claimed Crane Bank was in distress, it should have given Sudhir time to find an investor to inject new capital into the bank. Many banks were actually in negotiations with Crane to buy it.” ~ Mwenda

Basing on the historical lesson of Greenland bank, International Credit Bank and Cooperative bank, nothing justified CBL being given another chance to pursue remedial action especially under the same management that had failed to meet the minimum expectations to run a public Financial Institution. Apart from alleging that many banks were in negotiations with CBL, there is no attempt made to give us more information on which banks these were and what their offer was as well as their ability to stand tall amidst such an acquisition. Buying a bank is not merely about walking in with cash, there is a lot more to it than buying a car from a showroom.

BOU hamstrung Crane by stopping it from doing any new business like issuing new loans, overdrafts, bid bonds, performance guarantees, letters or credit etc. Crane was a bank for the business community. Stopping it from doing anything for three months was a disaster. It forced its customers who could not get a service to pull their money and business out of Crane to other banks and thereby transformed a capital adequacy problem into a liquidity crisis.”~ Mwenda

In the English language, there is an idiom, “throwing good money after bad.” It literally refers to spending more money on something problematic that one has already spent money on in the hope of fixing it. With the glaring evidence of poor corporate governance, insider lending highly linked to Mr. Sudhir Ruparelia, loans issued to one week old companies utilising collateral already pegged to previous loan applications, only a fool would allow CBL to dig a deeper hole. Mwenda conveniently avoids telling the public that CBL even before the BoU intervention was always negotiating with customers who wanted to make large withdrawals to spread them over a longer time frame. If it grunts like a pig, then it’s a pig. CBL had already dug the pit and could not be expected to get itself out of it.

Crane Bank had a good and wide branch network, a huge customer base, a great brand and $40m (Shs 144 billion) in tax assets. Its deposits had fallen from Shs 1.4 trillion to Shs 1.0 trillion because of BOU restrictions that caused a run on Crane. ~ Mwenda

Again, conveniently, he avoids notifying the general public that the net assets of CBL at the point of liquidation were negative to the tune of UGX 300Bn. The bank had client obligations of UGX 700Bn and the continued running of CBL was costing billions of shillings in losses monthly which was further eroding the company’s value.

There are other institutions that were interested in buying the Shs 550 billion worth of bad loans – at a discount of course. BOU refused this suggestion out of hand and therefore lost an opportunity to get a good deal. Instead it sold all the good and bad assets to DFCU at only Shs 175 billion ..”~ Mwenda

This is when I’m quickly tempted to remind Mwenda that selling off a bank isn’t akin to selling an old spent car. With the car, you can choose to sell off the engine, bumper, bonnet, doors, seats to different buyers. He insinuates that the bank could have been sold in bits and pieces based on who is offering what for the different portions. This is not how things are done my brother. There was need to maintain strategic balance in the banking industry hence the desire to get a takeover partner that not only knows the local market but has the muscle to ensure there is continued stability in the banking industry. I wish he could tell us more about those institutions that were interested in buying the bad loans and what their offers really were. Maybe he could win us to his side otherwise for now, this is mere samwa samwa (loose talk). Rumors do not apply here, we need to work with facts. DFCU is backed by ARISE BV that has invested over One Billion dollars in Africa.

BOU had injected Shs 450 billion of taxpayer money as liquidity into Crane Bank when it took over management. Under the sale agreement, DFCU is required to pay back this money to BOU over a period of three years without interest. Yet Sudhir had asked for a loan of only Shs 165 billion from BOU (as lender of last resort) at an interest rate of 5% to recapitalize the bank. So BOU would earn Shs 8.25 billion per year.” ~ Mwenda

Just in case Mwenda didn’t know this, DFCU was required to offer security for this UGX 450Bn injection BoU made into the ailing CBL. As a result, they attached most of the bank’s Treasury Bills to act as collateral. If they didn’t have them, then they would have probably been disqualified. The case he tries to make for Sudhir to be lent UGX 165 Billion is laughable and honestly it’s the last thing I expected from such an analytical mind. I have come across people who have lost money in the Telexfree scam, only to borrow more and get into the D9 scam, lose more money and now want to borrow more money to venture into another scam. CBL’s bubble had burst. The bank’s operations had become a ponzi scheme. No amount of continued lending especially to the same inept management would salvage it.

In fact if BOU had used the Shs 450 billion to buy distressed assets of banks, it would have saved many businesses from companies from collapse and with them jobs for Ugandans, taxes to government and promoted a healthy economy. And it would have earned interest of above 15% and made a huge profit…. DFCU took public funds for free.” ~ Mwenda

Again we are talking about treating symptoms here. How did CBL get to this point? As revealed earlier when analysing results from the PWC report, it is evident the bank was led into this state by its lead owner. This would be akin to rewarding a lion for eating a farmer’s cows. This is a situation where we are dealing with white collar crime. Once again, it would be good to have a list of some of the “many businesses” that Mwenda says collapsed and how many people they employed. I wouldn’t be surprised if reference here is to the shell businesses that were set up to merely act as conduits for money being siphoned out of the bank. As for DFCU taking public funds for free, I think that has already been dispelled earlier when I shared about the T-Bills put up as security.

Let us remember that BOU claimed that Crane Bank was insolvent, riddled with many bad loans and over statement of its actual financial position. So they sold its assets for Shs 175 billion only. What the news of DFCU profits for the first six months of taking over Crane Bank reveals is that BOU was either extremely incompetent and/or grossly misunderstood Crane Bank’s actual financial position. Or may be there was fraud. What we now know is that BOU sold very good assets at basement bargain prices. Why?” ~ Mwenda

I believe it is time to go for a quick lesson in accounting. When assessing banks for take over, the principle of Fair Value is used. It is the rational and unbiased estimate of the potential market price of a good, service or asset. It is usually done by specialists. In the case of CBL, a fair value assessment was done on customer deposits, physical cash and balances, loans and advances, computer software, listed stock and bonds, shares in private companies, land and buildings, furniture and fittings as well as other movable assets. So, when DFCU took over CBL, the fair value attached to the bank’s assets, less the acquired liabilities came up to UGX 60Bn. However, this does not mean that it’s money they actually inherited, it is the business potential of what they took over which might materialise or not. Based on accounting principles, this was reflected on the Profit & Loss of DFCU, hence the reflection of that profit that Mwenda dwells upon without bothering to find out how it got onto the books. When Fair Value is included, you have to make an effort to earn it tangibly, failure to do so implies that you have to remove it from the Profit and Loss statement. So, depending on how things go within the next one or two years, this Fair Value from CBL assets could easily diminish to zero thereby impacting the profit situation negatively.

DFCU had invested nothing to get these loans worth 800 billion. Given the average interest rate in Crane Bank of 25%, DFCU was inheriting an asset with income of Shs 200 billion (in form of interest per year). Yet it would have invested very little to earn this interest. It was obvious this was a deal made in heaven for DFCU.~ Mwenda

It is obscene to assert that DFCU invested nothing to get the loans of CBL when he is aware that the bank borrowed from its parent company US$ 50 Million in order to meet the core capital requirement of 12.5% by the Central Bank. Was it a deal made in heaven? No. DFCU exhibited the muscle required to manage this takeover without doubt. It’s a bank that has been around, established a solid reputation and shown consistent growth year on year. There is no evidence at least as of now of them cooking up their books, something which had become a pass time at Crane Bank. That 800Bn loan portfolio talked about is largely to cronies of Sudhir who chose to live large at the expense of public money and DFCU only needs prayers to recover that money. Without mentioning names here, I’m sure by browsing through the tabloids, you notice that all of a sudden, certain names that were famed for flashing money all over the place are no longer featuring, the noose is fast catching up.

What would have happened if CBL had been shutdown and liquidated?

To effectively understand the effect of a total closure of CBL, let us imagine a one Isma. Isma is an account holder with Crane Bank. He has a personal as well as a business account for his Workshop. Isma was given an opportunity to make supplies to a customer and as part of the agreement, a 50% deposit amounting to UGX 60 Million was wired to his business account. On his personal account, Isma has savings to the tune of UGX 17 Million which he hopes to grow to UGX 25 Million in order to buy his first plot of land.

One morning, he wakes up and he’s told, Crane Bank has been closed. First, he has to deal with the headache of the customer’s supplies, where is he going to get money to process them? Next is the uncertainty of his personal savings. This is a very grim possibility. I recall just after completing university when Greenland Bank was closed, a media house I had gotten accustomed to went down the drain overnight in the process. It was called the Crusader and one of its directors was Mr. Onapito Ekomoloit who eventually had to move on and seek employment elsewhere.

The next thing Isma hears is an announcement from the Bank of Uganda that all depositors in Crane Bank will be reimbursed upto a maximum UGX 3 Million Shillings which is what the Deposit Protection Fund guarantees. So, for his personal account, he should get ready to lose UGX 14 Million, money he has been saving over a year. While for his business, he loses at least UGX 42 Million of client money. Do you see the potential disaster?

In the case of Greenland Bank and ICB, the government strategically chose to pay up all depositors their outstanding dues on humanitarian grounds and thereafter went ahead to announce that in future, it would stick to what the law requires of it.

Did Mwenda want to see a scenario where depositors with UGX 100M in CBL walk away with a paltry UGX 3 Million? This would have further eroded the confidence in the banking industry hence the move to allow DFCU continue with operations of the bank while guaranteeing customers their money’s availability. The truth is, Sudhir and his cohorts had messed up the bank. Simple!!!

Whatever the case, DFCU demonstrated the ability to create continued stability in the banking sector of Uganda hence our need to applaud them for the take over. True, there were mistakes on the part of BoU especially in terms of supervision but that is a story for another day.

A close analysis of Crane Bank and its Investor(s) clearly reveals a systematic trail that begun years back to perpetuate questionable practices with the aim of disenfranchising the bank’s customers. Fraud risk factors are classified based on three conditions:

  1. An incentive or pressure to commit fraud – Yes there was
  2. A perceived opportunity to commit fraud – Not identified yet
  3. An ability to rationalise the fraudulent action – Yes, especially after altering the shareholding

These and many more issues may be addressed in a subsequent article if you the reader would like to know more.

So, Who raped Crane Bank?

John 8:23 ~ Then you will know the truth and the truth will set you free.

James Wire is a Small Business and Technology Consultant based in Kampala, Uganda

Follow @wirejames on Twitter.

Email lunghabo [at] gmail [dot] com

Other Articles of interest: