Tag Archives: sme

The problem is not EFRIS but Fiscal Molestation


It has been a seesaw game between the businessmen and women in Kampala and later countrywide over the past two weeks haggling over the EFRIS.

EFRIS in full is the Electronic Fiscal Receipting and Invoicing Solution. It is a digitalised form of tax collection monitoring that is aimed at not only making the process easier for the Government to collect tax but also aimed at widening the catchment of tax collection.

Ideally speaking it is a good approach if one wants to ensure that Ugandans participate equally in tax contribution. We currently have a system where the biggest burden of tax collection lies upon those employed in White Collar Jobs. Mainly because it is the easier tax to collect through their employers.

Now here comes a situation where donor funds are dwindling and we are having to look inward for solutions to the financial crisis being created. When one objectively looks at the resentment the society is putting up against the EFRIS system, you realise that the source of the problem is actually more to do with the way the Government of Uganda is running its affairs.

For a long time, the Government has practiced alot of Fiscal Abuse. How?

Judge by looking at what characterises the relationship the Government of Uganda has with its citizens and the business community especially the Local Ugandans;

  1. Misuse of Tax Payer’s money for individual gain. Let us face it, this has become typical of the current government’s way of doing business. Day in, Day out, you hear stories of depressing scenarios where tax payers’ money is casually put to bad use and no one gives a hoot.
    The Uganda Police bought a fixed wing aircraft at 30.8 Billion Shillings in 2018 and after sitting around idle for all this time, six years later, it is up for sale at 16.6 Billion Shs (Half the purchase price) with the claim that it is not suitable for use.
    Uganda Railways bought 4 used locomotives at 48 Billion Shs when there was an option to buy brand new ones at a cheaper cost of 36 Billion Shs, only for them to be found incompatible with our rails. All that happened later was the President’s directive to sack the entire Board and its MD. Case closed.
  2. Spending money without consent. It has become fashion in Government to spend money without the consent of Parliament only to work backwards and cajole the legislators to clean up the act. There is a reason why the Government is divided into three arms and it is the abuse of the roles of those arms that has led us to this. Failure to seek consent implies working outside budgetary lines hence driving the treasury into a mess. Recently the Ministry of Finance was in the spotlight for spending 4 Trillion Shs without authorisation from the parliament.
  3. Willful deprivation of society. One can authoritatively state that the Government exercises willful deprivation to some sections of the society of which the local business community is one of those. This is the category that is always left with alot of hurdles to surmount during their quest to trade and appeals for help always hit a dead end. They are never looked at as investors. Investors are those that fly into the country, usually charcterised by a melanin deprived skin complex and possessing money to buy their way to meet the President only to walk away with free land acquisition, tax holidays that last forever and the freedom to break all the rules that apply to the local business community. These same investers while claiming to be manufacturers turn into wholesalers and retailers of the very goods they claim to manufacture. This has the net effect of pushing out the local traders from the few available value chain segments that they could exploit.
  4. Disadvantaging the local Ugandan. It is common knowledge that there are sectors where the Government officials prefer to give foreigners the opportunity of execution usually under the pretext of lack of local capacity. What befuddles one is that this excuse has been advanced for over three decades. Now, if you know that a problem exists, why not work towards solving it? This takes us back to the willful deprivation that is practised.
  5. Passive Neglect. As a nation, society in general is suffering from passive neglect and this is more pronounced within the business community that has to traverse the nation in order to execute its activities. The state of the roads is poor and while a few highways might have a semblance of being fair, the story is so sad when one drives off them which is where the business community either sources raw material from or accesses markets for its products and services. The drive to improve these roads is very minimal and an excuse is always directed at the lack of funds. This excuse loses meaning when you keenly observe the selective choices made of rushing to build roads in the Oil belt of Bunyoro as well as the tourism belt of South Western Uganda. It makes one think that other than Oil and Tourism, good roads are not a necessity for other parts of Uganda devoid of those two opportunities.
  6. Corruption. They started by stealing Thousands and we got used to that. Then they graduated to Millions and we got used to that. They went further to Billions and we looked on. Now they have reached Trillions and expect us to consider it Business as Usual. No!!! People are getting fed up. The fatigue to the tax payer is too much. Not even the blackmail of Homosexual funded activism against corruption will make us shut up. Our patience is thinning out so much that it is soon becoming like a dry banana leaf that requires only one small spark to light up the entire plantation. Comments like; Let them steal, afterall they are investing in the local market only aggravate our anger.
  7. Extravagant Expenditure. We have been moved to a state of dread and despair when we keep being bombarded by all sorts of stories of wasteful expenditure by civil servants. You hear how;
  • Relocating a Ghost from Nambole Stadium cost Billions of shillings only for the witchdoctor to later claim he was simply beaten to pulp and ordered to leave the place.
  • Statehouse spends 2.8 Billion Shs daily as of 2023
  • A Parliamentary budget that is 4 times that of the Ministry of Health
  • A stagnated 264 bed Lubowa Hospital to cost US$ 379 Million, six times more than the 400 Bed Benjamin Mkapa Hospital in Dodoma that cost US$ 60 Million to construct and fully furnish.
  • A 2.1GW Julius Nyerere Hydro Power plant constructed at a cost of US$ 2.1 Billion while a 600MW Karuma Dam in Uganda costs US$ 600 Million. The latter has a production capaciry close to one quarter of the former.
  • Billions being forked out in fictitious allowances by public entities annually.
  • The Coffee Investment Consortium of Uganda is given another grant of US$ 36 Million as a follow up to an accounted for earlier grant of US$ 10 Million
    and much more…..

All this is paid for by you and me the tax payer. We see these things, they hurt us and if we could do something about it, trust me it would be far from civil. Put our money to good use and we shall painfully pay the taxes without questioning. Every time I hear about the advances being made by our neighbor Tanzania, I am driven into a depression. You are free to ignore what we say, but remember, life’s big changes rarely give advance warning.

EFRIS may be the avenue people are using to express their dissatisfaction today but tomorrow it could be something worse. If there is anything that makes me fear the state of a fed up society, it is the way Nicolae Ceaușescu the invincible President of Romania was brought down to his knees by a populace too fed up to live. This was in 1989. Let us not lead this country’s citizens to that point.

Engh’elawule …..

For God and My Country.

James Wire
X – @wirejames
Threads – @wire_james

Your Excellency, PDM will not create 70 Million Jobs.


Your Excellency, President of the Republic of Uganda, I salute you. Today I want to challenge an utterance you made during your speech on Labour day claiming that the Parish Development Model shall create more jobs than the number of citizens in the country and you put the figure at 70 Million.

I agree with your assertion based upon two premises that must go hand in hand. Proper implementation of the PDM project and Time. Without those two being fulfilled in tandem, you are blowing wind in a basket while expecting it to turn into a balloon.

The PDM has seven pillars that need to be addressed in tandem in order to achieve the promises made and for purposes of clarity, I will quickly highlight them below;
(1) Production, Storage, Processing and Marketing;
(2) Infrastructure and Economic Services;
(3) Financial Inclusion;
(4) Social Services;
(5) Mindset change;
(6) Parish Based Management Information System
(7) Governance and Administration.

However, due to ignorance or probably a desire to achieve cheap popularity, the promoters of the initiative are focusing on Pillar 5 of Finances. Everywhere you go, talk of PDM is narrowed down to Money and this has vulgarised the entire program. Right from the time the Rt. Hon Prime Minister started traversing the country popularising this initiative while gyrating from district to district, her core message was Money is coming. Most Hon Members of Parliament also caught the bug and started reciting the same chorus.

Lately, when you hear complaints about PDM, they evolve around, not receiving money. Even when money is received it is akin to a delivery for sports betting jackpot winners. At this rate, its intended aim of creating wealth, employment and increasing household incomes will never be achieved at a macro level. The most we shall boast of are pockets of achievers who are even largely outside the intended target group of the poorest of the poor.

You so casually quoted an estimated 7 million households participating in this initiative with each creating at least ten jobs hence the derivation of the 70 Million jobs. With all due respect Sir, there is a difference between Something to do and a Job. How I wish your advisors took time to clarify more on that.

The other shortcoming in your speculative assumption is the desktop approach used that many failed business people have also engaged. They simply sit at a computer, fill in their expectations in a spreadsheet and come out smiling with grandiose summed up figures that only achieve the goal of massaging an uninformed mind. This is the other mistake your advisor(s) made.

For your information sir, I am an Agricultural Economist who also has a Masters in Business Administration and a fully fledged Agribusiness entrepreneur. So I speak from a point of not only academic knowledge-ability but also practical exposure in the agricultural space. Do not regard me as a mere social media heckler. I also participated in the pilot project of the PDM in Eastern Uganda.

Where are the shortcomings;

The fusion of the NRM party structures with the Government in its implementation. I was taken back when upon reaching Butaleja district and we had to kick off the work, instead of heading to the district officials, we had to meet the NRM district chairman. So many other activities down the chain were organised by NRM party functionaries and the district technocrats were only expected to come in during trainings. This caused some rift in the implementation and as a result greatly compromised effective output.
Clarity is required on whether this is a party or government initiative.

The Parish was designed to play the key role of project implementation. However, the current legal regime does not empower them to have the kind of responsibilities that this project requires of them. Over time, this is likely to create pockets of conflict.

While money was released to recruit Parish Chiefs allover the country for this initiative, most are severely incompetent to carry out the expected roles and on top of that lack even the basic infrastructure like offices to operate.

There are numerous questions around the voluntary Parish Development Committees that are required to shoulder the PDM implementation responsibility. There seems to be a clash with the work that sub counties do.

Technical officers and Political leaders seem to be speaking different languages especially when it comes to the selection of beneficiaries. So much influence peddling is taking place and I recall a case of a top female politician in one of the districts in the East that fought hard to be included as a PDM beneficiary.

The SACCO creation is highly bloated with beneficiaries being herded like goats to form a grouping that quickly gets to be called a SACCO, given little or no training at all on what and how they will operate and then made to sign papers with a promise to receive Money!!!! There are also cases of people paying money to middlemen in order to be listed as SACCO members with the ultimate goal of getting money.

The services these SACCOs are meant to handle are a multitude and require highly secialised skillsets if any benefit is to come out of the move. Extension services, production, bulking and marketing, accountability among others are activities the SACCOs have to engage in and not any Tom, Dick and Harry can undertake these activities.

The CAO as per the model has been made the Accounting Officer of the Parish Revolving Fund while the questionable Parish Chief is both the accounting officer and administrative head at the parish level. Considering the huge sums of money to be dispensed, we are readying ourselves for another Mabaati scandal of gargantuan proportions.

The model is conspicuously silent on the private sector participation with the assumption that the value and supply chains can be effectively handled by the PDM organisations solely. This is going to lead to unnecessary duplication of resources and unintended failures as a result of inexperience.

These among others are the reasons I want to let you know that you were misguided into thinking that the Parish Development Model will generate 70 Million new jobs.

I Submit.

James Wire
Business & Technology Consultant
Twitter: @wirejames
Blog: https://wirejames.com